TIDUCL3 February   2017

 

  1. 1 Overview
  2. 2 Resources
  3. 3 Features
  4. 4 Applications
  5. 5 Design Images
  6. 6 System Overview
    1. 6.1 System Description
    2. 6.2 Key System Specifications
    3. 6.3 Block Diagram
    4. 6.4 Highlighted Products
      1. 6.4.1 LMT87-Q1
      2. 6.4.2 TLC555-Q1
      3. 6.4.3 OPA2377-Q1
      4. 6.4.4 TL431-Q1
      5. 6.4.5 TPS92691-Q1
  7. 7 System Design Theory
    1. 7.1  PCB and Form Factor
    2. 7.2  Optimizing Board Performance Based on LED String Voltage and Current
    3. 7.3  Switching Frequency
    4. 7.4  Output Overvoltage Protection (OVP)
    5. 7.5  Current Monitoring (IMON)
    6. 7.6  Thermal Foldback
      1. 7.6.1 Changing Thermal Foldback Response
        1. 7.6.1.1 Changing Starting Point for Thermal Foldback
        2. 7.6.1.2 Changing Slope of Thermal Foldback
        3. 7.6.1.3 Constant Current at High Temperatures
      2. 7.6.2 Thermal Foldback Without PWM Dimming
    7. 7.7  Clock Generation (PWM)
    8. 7.8  Onboard Supply and Setting Duty Cycle
    9. 7.9  Buffering, Averaging, and Filtering
    10. 7.10 Boost Converter
  8. 8 Getting Started Hardware
    1. 8.1 Hardware
    2. 8.2 LED Selection
    3. 8.3 J3, LED+, LED– (Boost)
    4. 8.4 J1, POS(+), NEG(–)
    5. 8.5 J4, Temperature Sensor Connection
    6. 8.6 Duty Cycle Adjust
  9. 9 Testing and Results
    1. 9.1 Duty Cycle Accuracy
    2. 9.2 Thermal Foldback Testing
    3. 9.3 EMI Testing
    4. 9.4 Accuracy Calculation
  10. 10Design Files
    1. 10.1 Schematics
    2. 10.2 Bill of Materials
    3. 10.3 PCB Layout Recommendations
      1. 10.3.1 Layout Prints
    4. 10.4 Altium Project
    5. 10.5 Gerber Files
    6. 10.6 Assembly Drawings
  11. 11Related Documentation
    1. 11.1 Trademarks
  12. 12About the Author

9.1 Duty Cycle Accuracy

  1. The board ran continuously with a fixed duty cycle set and the duty cycle recorded continuously with the oscilloscope and standard deviation calculated (see Figure 24).
    2. TIDA-01382 tida-01382-duty-cycle-accuracy.pngFigure 24. Duty Cycle Accuracy

    The result was a very accurate duty cycle with a standard deviation of 848µ% (0.000848%).

  2. Different clock devices (TLC555) from a different production batch were tested on the same board.

    3. The result was a very accurate duty cycle with a standard deviation of less than 0.5%.

  3. Temperature test: –40°C to 110°C. The board ran continuously with a fixed duty cycle set and the duty cycle continuously recorded with an oscilloscope and standard deviation calculated.

    4. The result was a very accurate duty cycle with a standard deviation of less than 0.5%.