SLVK280 March   2026 INA1H182-SEP

 

  1.   1
  2.   2
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Overview
  5. 2SEE Mechanisms
  6. 3Irradiation Facilities and Telemetry
  7. 4Test Device and Test Board Information
    1. 4.1 Qualification Circuits and Boards
    2. 4.2 Characterization Devices and Test Board Schematics
  8. 5Results
    1. 5.1 SEL Qualification Results: TAMU Cyclotron Radiation Effects Facility
    2. 5.2 SET Characterization Results
    3. 5.3 Analysis
  9. 6Summary
  10.   A Transient Results Appendix
  11.   B References

SET Characterization Results

A fresh DUTs were used for SET characterization. The conditions for each run are summarized on Table 5-4 below. The run numbers listed are the acutal run numbers from the testing session, and the flux, fluence, and dose silicon foreach run are pulled forn the test session log provided by the Texas A & M K500 Cyclotron facility.

Unit SET_DUT6 was configured with a gain of 100V/V using a RG resistor of 499Ω. The device was tested at maximum specified supply voltage range of ±9V (or 18V total supply) and input common mode voltage (VCM) of ±5V with a input differential voltage VDIFF of ±50mV. The REF pin was biased at mid-supply (0V). The device output channel was loaded with a 2kΩ resistance to GND (mid-supply). Tests were repeated at a supply voltage of ±2.5V (or 5V total supply) with VCM =±0.4V and VDIFF of ±10mV.

Since the device was set on a high gain of 100V/V, the instrumentation amplifier output amplifies extrinsic noise present in the test environment. The oscilloscopes were set to a window trigger mode that captured any events where the output shifted by ±200mV or more.

The INA1H182-SEP devices were exposed to LET levels varying from 46.7MeV-cm2/mg to 1.33MeV-cm2/mg. An ambient temperature of approximately 25°C was recorded in the facility at the time of these tests. Test runs 39 - 46 involved the testing of a different product not related to the INA1H182-SEP, and therefore are excluded in this report.

Table 5-4 TAMU SET Characterization Run Summary
Run NumberDUTSupply

(V)

VDIFF

(V)

VCM

(V)

Gain

(V/V)

IonLETeff

(MeV-cm2/mg)

Flux

( ions/s-cm2)

Fluence

(ions/cm2)

Total Ionizing Dose

(rad)

Events
15SET_D6±950.05100109Ag46.78.95×1041.00×10775042517
16SET_D6±9-5-0.05100109Ag46.77.84×1049.96×10675432220
17SET_D6±2.50.40.01100109Ag46.71.17×1051.00×10775111374
18SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.01100109Ag46.71.00×1051.01×10775231625
19SET_D6±950.0510084Kr33.51.10×1059.96×10653481049
20SET_D6±9-5-0.0510084Kr33.51.11×1059.94×1065366900
21SET_D6±2.50.40.0110084Kr33.51.08×1051.00×1075373704
22SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.0110084Kr33.51.16×1059.96×1065346703
23SET_D6±950.0510084Kr29.59.93×1041.00×1074719881
24SET_D6±9-5-0.0510084Kr29.58.06×1041.00×1074731721
25SET_D6±2.50.40.0110084Kr29.57.31×1049.97×1064706505
26SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.0110084Kr29.51.17×1051.00×1074728485
27SET_D6±950.0510063Cu19.61.10×1059.99×1063129584
28SET_D6±9-5-0.0510063Cu19.61.15×1051.00×1073135486
29SET_D6±2.50.40.0110063Cu19.61.13×1059.96×1063121334
30SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.0110063Cu19.61.07×1051.00×1073144270
31SET_D6±950.0510040Ar8.411.10×1059.95×106134082
32SET_D6±950.0510040Ar8.411.12×1059.96×106134271
33SET_D6±2.50.40.0110040Ar8.411.12×1051.00×107134731
34SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.0110040Ar8.411.16×1051.01E+07134819
35SET_D6±950.0510020Ne2.731.13×1051.01×10743917
36SET_D6±9-5-0.0510020Ne2.731.13×1051.00×10743719
37SET_D6±2.50.40.0110020Ne2.731.20×1051.00×10743818
38SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.0110020Ne2.731.22×1059.98×1064360
47SET_D6±950.0510014N1.331.15×1059.99×10621322
48SET_D6±9-5-0.0510014N1.331.15×1059.96×10621219
49SET_D6±2.50.40.0110014N1.331.03×1059.98×1062127
50SET_D6±2.5-0.4-0.0110014N1.331.17×1051.00×1072130
 Device Under Test Lined Up With the BeamFigure 5-6 Device Under Test Lined Up With the Beam

A separate SET testing session was performed with 3 additional fresh devices at the MSU Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) using a linear particle accelerator ion source. The run numbers listed are the actual run numbers from the testing session, and the flux, fluence, and dose silicon for each run are pulled from the test session log provided by the MSU FRIB Linac facility. A summary of the conditions in test runs performed is provided on Table 5-5.

Devices were tested up at the operating supply of ±9V with different gains of 1V/V, 20V/V, 50V/V and 100V/V. The devices were exposed to a LET level of 50.4MeV-cm2/mg. The oscilloscope card was set to a window trigger mode that captured any events where the output shifted by ±200mV or more.

Table 5-5 MSU FRIB SET Run Summary
Run NumberDUTSupply

(V)

VDIFF

(V)

VCM

(V)

Gain

(V/V)

IonLETeff

(MeV-cm2/mg)

Flux

( ions/s-cm2)

Fluence

(ions/cm2)

Total Ionizing Dose

(rad)

Events
61SET_B1±90.1000.0520129Xe50.41.047×1059.840×106794012041
65SET_B2±90.0400.02050129Xe50.41.067×1059.924×106800812018
69SET_B3±90.0200.010100129Xe50.41.038×1051.007×10781298364
73SET_B4±92.0001.0001129Xe50.41.082×1051.002×107808215256