SPRZ536C September   2022  – June 2026 AM69 , AM69A , TDA4AH-Q1 , TDA4AP-Q1 , TDA4APE-Q1 , TDA4VH-Q1 , TDA4VP-Q1 , TDA4VPE-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2. 1Modules Affected
  3. 2Nomenclature, Package Symbolization, and Revision Identification
    1. 2.1 Device and Development-Support Tool Nomenclature
    2. 2.2 Devices Supported
    3. 2.3 Package Symbolization and Revision Identification
  4. 3Silicon Revision 1.0 Usage Notes and Advisories
    1. 3.1 Silicon Revision 1.0 Usage Notes
      1.      i2134
    2. 3.2 Silicon Revision 1.0 Advisories
      1.      i2049
      2.      i2062
      3.      i2063
      4.      i2064
      5.      i2065
      6.      i2079
      7.      i2087
      8.      i2097
      9.      i2102
      10.      i2103
      11.      i2120
      12.      i2134
      13.      i2137
      14.      i2146
      15.      i2157
      16.      i2159
      17.      i2160
      18.      i2161
      19.      i2163
      20.      i2166
      21.      i2177
      22.      i2189
      23.      i2190
      24.      i2196
      25.      i2197
      26.      i2205
      27.      i2215
      28.      i2216
      29.      i2219
      30.      i2232
      31.      i2234
      32.      i2242
      33.      i2244
      34.      i2249
      35.      i2253
      36.      i2271
      37.      i2272
      38.      i2278
      39.      i2279
      40.      i2310
      41.      i2311
      42.      i2312
      43.      i2320
      44.      i2326
      45.      i2330
      46.      i2351
      47.      i2362
      48.      i2366
      49.      i2371
      50.      i2372
      51.      i2378
      52.      i2381
      53.      i2383
      54.      i2399
      55.      i2401
      56.      i2409
      57.      i2413
      58.      i2414
      59.      i2415
      60.      i2419
      61.      i2422
      62.      i2424
      63.      i2431
      64.      i2435
      65.      i2436
      66.      i2437
      67.      i2449
      68.      i2459
      69.      i2482
  5.   Trademarks
  6.   Revision History

i2196

IA: Potential deadlock scenarios in IA

Details:

The interrupt Aggregator (IA) has one main function, which is to convert events arriving on the Event Transport Lane (ETL) bus, can convert them to interrupt status bits which are used to generate level interrupts. The block that performed this function in IA version 1.0 was called the status event block.

In addition to the status event block, there are two other main processing blocks; the multicast event block, and the counted event block. The multicast block really functions as an event splitter. For every event it takes in, it can generate two output events. The counted event block is used to convert high frequency events into a readable count. It counts input events and generates output events on count transitions to/from 0 to/from non-zero count values. Unlike the status event block, the multicast and counted event blocks generate output ETL events that are then mapped to other processing blocks.

An issue was found after design that could cause the IA to deadlock. The issue occurs when event “loops” occur between these three processing blocks. It is possible to create a situation where a processing block can not output an event because the path is blocked, and since it can not output an event, it can not take any new input events. This inability to take input events prevents the output path from being able to unwind, and thus both paths remain blocked.

Workaround(s):

Figure 3-3 shows the conceptual block diagram of IA 1.0. Potential loops are avoided by adopting the policy of not allowing the counted event block to send events to the multicast block. This method was chosen because it is more common to split an event first, and then count one while sending the other elsewhere. With this path blocked by convention, it is not possible for a single event to visit any block more than once and thus not possible for paths to become blocked so long as the outputs remain unblocked.

 Interrupt Aggregator Version 1.0 Figure 3-3 Interrupt Aggregator Version 1.0

By following the conventions outlined here, the system is safe from looping hazards that can create a deadlock scenario.