SLYA060 August   2022 TMAG5110 , TMAG5110-Q1 , TMAG5111 , TMAG5111-Q1

 

  1.   Abstract
  2.   Trademarks
  3. 1 Introduction
  4. 2 System Block Diagram
  5. 3 Key System Specifications
  6. 4 HW Connections
  7. 5 Software
    1. 5.1 TI-RSLK LaunchPad Software
    2. 5.2 LaunchPad Software
  8. 6 How to Design With Hall-Effect Latches
  9. 7 Simulation Results
    1. 7.1 Select Device Sensitivity
    2. 7.2 Select Axis of Sensitivity
  10. 8 Performance Comparison
    1. 8.1 Speed and Direction
    2. 8.2 Power Consumption
    3. 8.3 Susceptibility to External Particles
  11. 9 Encoder Board Schematic and Image
  12. 10Summary

Power Consumption

To test the power consumption of each encoder systems, we disconnected the encorders from the TI-RSLK system and powered them separately. In doing so, we are able to isolate the power consumption required by each encoder technology. The TMAG5111 encoder board showed a clear advantage over its optical counterpart, consuming 5 mA during operation (Figure 8-4), while the IR encoder board consumed a total of 20 mA during operation (Figure 8-5). Adding another IR encoder for direction would most likely double the power consumption, all while the Hall-effect board would remain at 5 mA because both the speed and direction are included in one device.

GUID-20220705-SS0I-FXS3-S54N-0XMDSKJZ61RL-low.jpgFigure 8-4 TMAG5111 Encoder Current Consumption.
GUID-20220705-SS0I-FWQV-N6XJ-30LSLRW1NJ6P-low.jpgFigure 8-5 IR Encoder Current Consumption.