SLVK282 April 2026 ISOS510-SEP
SET are defined as heavy-ion-induced transients upsets on the VOUT of the ISOS510-SEP.
Testing was performed at room temperature (no external temperature control applied). The heavy-ions species used for SET testing was 109Ag, 84Kr, 40Ar and 14N at 15MeV/nucleon. 109Ag, 84Kr, 40Ar, and 14N for LETEFF from 1.34 to 47MeV×cm2/mg, for more details refer to Table 4-1. Flux of 105 ions×cm2/s and a fluence of 1 × 107 ions/cm2, per run were used for the characterization of the SET.
Table 7-1 shows the signal size, sample rate, trigger type, value, and signal for all scopes.
| Scope Model | Trigger Signal | Trigger Type | Trigger Value | Record Length | Sample Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PXIe-5172 | VOUT | Window | ±3% | 10k | 100MS/s |
| ±5% |
For the VIN of approximately 4.3V and VCE of 3.3V with a VOUT of approximately 1V, four units were characterized from 47MeV down to 1.34MeV. 109Ag was used to achieve LETEFF = 47MeV and 14N was used to achieve LETEFF = 1.34MeV. A PXIe-5172 scope was used to monitor the VOUT signals of the ISOS510-SEP with VOUT triggering off a 3% and 5% window. Table 7-2 summarizes the results for the four units tested.
Typical Low and High observed VOUT transients are shown in Figure 7-1 and Figure 7-2 respectively. Figure 7-3 show that although the signal goes beyond the 3% window, the signal recovers back to nominal and the device continues to operate properly.
Table 7-4 shows the Weibull fit parameters and the Weibull fit plot. Figure 7-4 and Figure 7-5 shows the Weibull fit plots for the VOUT 3% and 5% triggers.
| RUN # | UNIT # | Facility | Ion | LETEFF (MeV×cm2/mg) | FLUX (ions×cm2/mg) | FLUENCE (number of ions) | Window Trigger | PXIe-5172 VOUT SET Upsets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 4 | TAMU | 109Ag | 47 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 2655 |
| 14 | 4 | TAMU | 109Ag | 47 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2890 |
| 15 | 5 | TAMU | 84Kr | 30.1 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 2386 |
| 16 | 5 | TAMU | 84Kr | 30.1 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2796 |
| 17 | 6 | TAMU | 40Ar | 8.54 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 1885 |
| 18 | 6 | TAMU | 40Ar | 8.54 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2279 |
| 19 | 7 | TAMU | 14N | 1.34 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 690 |
| 20 | 7 | TAMU | 14N | 1.34 | 1.00 × 105 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2021 |
Figure 7-1 shows the typical low observed VOUT for Run #14. Transient reached a peak of approximately 0.14V and recovered within approximately 18.8μs
Figure 7-1 Typical Low Observed VOUT
Transient on Run #14Figure 7-2 shows the typical high observed VOUT for Run #14. Transient reached a peak of approximately 2.51V and recovered within approximately 17.3μs
Figure 7-2 Typical High Observed VOUT
Transient on Run #14
Figure 7-3 Overlay of all VOUT Transients on Run # 14Using the MFTF method, the upper-bound cross section (using a 95% confidence level) is calculated for the different SETs as shown below.
| Ion | LETEFF (MeV×cm2/mg) | FLUENCE (# ions) | Window Trigger | PXIe-5172 VOUT SET Upsets | Upper Bound Cross Section (cm2 /device) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 109Ag | 47 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 2655 | 2.76 × 10–4 |
| 109Ag | 47 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2890 | 3.00 × 10–4 |
| 84Kr | 30.1 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 2386 | 2.48 × 10–4 |
| 84Kr | 30.1 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2796 | 2.90 × 10–4 |
| 40Ar | 8.54 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 1885 | 1.97 × 10–4 |
| 40Ar | 8.54 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2279 | 2.37 × 10–4 |
| 14N | 1.34 | 1.00 × 107 | 5% | 690 | 7.43 × 10–5 |
| 14N | 1.34 | 1.00 × 107 | 3% | 2021 | 2.11 × 10–4 |
| Parameters | 3% | 5% |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-saturation (cm2) | 4.18 × 10–4 | 3.43 × 10–4 |
| w | 14.99 | 14.98 |
| s | 0.15 | 0.32 |