SPRZ491D december   2020  – june 2023 DRA821U , DRA821U-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2. 1Modules Affected
  3. 2Nomenclature, Package Symbolization, and Revision Identification
    1. 2.1 Device and Development-Support Tool Nomenclature
    2. 2.2 Devices Supported
    3. 2.3 Package Symbolization and Revision Identification
  4. 3Silicon Revision 1.0, 2.0 Usage Notes and Advisories
    1. 3.1 Silicon Revision 1.0, 2.0 Usage Notes
    2. 3.2 Silicon Revision 1.0, 2.0 Advisories
    3.     i2049
    4.     i2062
    5.     i2091
    6.     i2116
    7.     i2123
    8. 3.3 i2126
    9. 3.4 i2127
    10.     i2134
    11.     i2137
    12.     i2146
    13. 3.5 i2151
    14.     i2157
    15.     i2159
    16.     i2160
    17.     i2161
    18.     i2163
    19.     i2166
    20.     i2177
    21.     i2182
    22.     i2183
    23.     i2184
    24.     i2185
    25.     i2186
    26.     i2187
    27.     i2189
    28.     i2196
    29.     i2197
    30.     i2201
    31.     i2205
    32.     i2207
    33.     i2208
    34.     i2209
    35.     i2216
    36.     i2217
    37.     i2221
    38.     i2222
    39.     i2227
    40.     i2228
    41.     i2232
    42.     i2234
    43.     i2235
    44.     i2237
    45.     i2241
    46.     i2242
    47.     i2243
    48.     i2244
    49.     i2245
    50.     i2246
    51.     i2249
    52.     i2253
    53.     i2257
    54.     i2274
    55.     i2275
    56.     i2277
    57.     i2278
    58.     i2279
    59.     i2283
    60.     i2306
    61.     i2307
    62.     i2310
    63.     i2311
    64.     i2312
    65.     i2320
    66.     i2326
    67.     i2329
    68.     i2351
    69.     i2360
    70.     i2361
    71.     i2362
    72.     i2366
    73.     i2371
    74.     i2372
    75.     i2383
  5.   Trademarks
  6.   Revision History

i2207

CBASS: Command Arbitration Blocking

Details:

When the interconnect arbitrates commands from multiple sources, the higher priority request always takes precedence. Requests that are at the same priority level are arbitrated in round-robin fashion. The issue is after the higher priority request goes idle and there are two or more pending requests that are at the same priority level, the hardware selects one of them arbitrarily. A potential issue may arise when software polls from multiple sources to the same endpoint: after servicing the higher priority source, the hardware may repeatedly select the same lower priority source for access. That means other same-lower priority requests may be blocked for a long time, and in the worst case if there are dependencies between the polling sequences, the software may run into a livelock state.

This issue only affects certain interconnect where in one switch module there are at least three sources that can access the same target simultaneously. Also note that when all requests are at the same priority level, the issue does not apply.

Workaround(s):

When multiple sources are simultaneously polling from the same endpoint, and there is expected dependency based on the read data, ensure that all sources are sending the read commands at the same priority level. The source that breaks the dependency should be at equal or higher priority than other dependent sources.