SLUP413A May 2024 – April 2026 TPS53689T
Figure 15 and Figure 16 show a simulated comparison between a multiphase buck converter and a TLVR design under the same load step-down condition. This simulation uses the same parameters as those in Table 2.
A few observations about Figure 15 and Figure 16:
Again, the relationship of ILC to ISUM explains the superior transient response of the TLVR design. And again, all inductors in the system follow the fundamental inductor relationship. During the transient response to the load step-down, the converter turns off all phases, NTOTAL, simultaneously. Equation 19 shows the falling ISUM slope for the multiphase buck converter:
Using a similar analysis, Equation 20 shows the falling ISUM slope for the TLVR design, assuming that the TLVR magnetizing inductance LM is equal to the buck filter inductor L for comparison purposes. The TLVR design ramps down its ISUM faster given the factor from the LC loop, which decreases proportionally to the square of the number of phases, NTOTAL.