SBOK052 May   2024 OPA4H014-SEP

 

  1.   1
  2.   OPA4H014-SEP Single-Event Latch-Up (SEL) Radiation Report
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Overview
  5. 2SEE Mechanisms
  6. 3Irradiation Facilities and Telemetry
  7. 4Test Device and Test Board Information
    1. 4.1 Qualification Devices and Test Board
    2. 4.2 Characterization Devices and Test Boards
  8. 5Results
    1. 5.1 SEL Qualification Results
    2. 5.2 SET Characterization Results: TAMU K500 Cyclotron
    3. 5.3 SEE Characterization Results: MSU FRIB Linac
    4. 5.4 Analysis
    5. 5.5 Weibull Fit
  9. 6Summary
  10.   A TAMU Results Appendix
  11.   B MSU Results Appendix
  12.   C Confidence Interval Calculations
  13.   D References

SET Characterization Results: TAMU K500 Cyclotron

Two fresh DUTs were used for follow-up SEL characterization. The die temperature of each was held at 125°C as the units were exposed to an ion stream of 109Ag, for a nominal surface LET of 44.8MeV-cm2 /mg (Bragg peak approximately 59.4MeV-cm2 /mg). A nominal flux of 105 ions / s-cm2 was used, with each run concluding once a fluence of 107ions/cm2 was reached. Each DUT was tested at both maximum and minimum supply voltages, and in both buffer and positive-gain circuit configurations, with an input signal of VIN = 1V for buffer circuits and VIN = 0.1V for positive-gain circuits. Each output channel was loaded with a 2kΩ resistance to GND (midsupply). No latchup was observed for either DUT under any of the test conditions.

Table 5-2 TAMU SEL Characterization Run Summary
Run Number DUT Die Temperature (°C) Ion LETeff (MeV-cm2 /mg) Flux ( ions/s-cm2) Fluence (ions/cm2) Total Ionizing Dose (rad) VS (V+ − V-) Gain
1 1 125 109Ag 44.8 9.717 × 104 1.001 × 107 7187 4.5 1
2 1 125 109Ag 44.8 1.005 × 105 1.003 × 107 7203 18 1
3 1 125 109Ag 44.8 1.028 × 105 9.963 × 106 7156 4.5 10
4 1 125 109Ag 44.8 1.002 × 105 9.974 × 106 7164 18 10
5 2 125 109Ag 44.8 1.015 × 105 9.991 × 106 7176 4.5 1
6 2 125 109Ag 44.8 1.011 × 105 1.004 × 107 7209 18 1
7 2 125 109Ag 44.8 1.008 × 105 9.991 × 106 7176 4.5 10
8 2 125 109Ag 44.8 1.046 × 105 1.002 × 107 7195 18 10
 Device Under Test Lined Up
                    With the K500 Beam Figure 5-5 Device Under Test Lined Up With the K500 Beam

Of the two devices tested, DUT 1 was preserved for documentation purposes. DUT 2 was used for further SET characterization, in addition to two other fresh devices (DUTs 3 and 5). Each device was tested at both maximum and minimum supply voltages in a buffer circuit configuration. An input signal of VIN = −1.5V was used for all tests, with the oscilloscopes set to a window trigger mode that captured any events where the output shifted by ±100mV or more. Each output channel was loaded with a 2kΩ resistance to GND (midsupply).

Four readpoints of 45.8MeV-cm2 / mg, 34.5MeV-cm2 / mg, 29.1MeV-cm2 / mg, and 19.3MeV-cm2 / mg were explored. The conditions for each run are summarized below. An ambient temperature of approximately 20°C was recorded in the facility at the time of these tests. See Appendix A for additional data, such as histograms.

Table 5-3 TAMU SET Characterization Run Summary
Run Number DUT Ion LETeff (MeV-cm2 /mg) Flux ( ions/s-cm2) Fluence (ions/cm2) Total Ionizing Dose (rad) VS (V+ − V-) Events (Sum of All Channels)
5 2 109Ag 45.8 1.135 × 105 1 × 107 36760 18 3081
6 2 109Ag 45.8 1.153 × 105 9.996 × 106 36730 4.5 2453
7 5 109Ag 45.8 1.077 × 105 9.997 × 106 36730 4.5 3192
8 5 109Ag 45.8 1.049 × 105 1.0 × 107 36760 18 3789
9 3 109Ag 45.8 9.974 × 104 1.001 × 107 36780 18 4235
10 3 109Ag 45.8 1.104 × 105 1.001 × 107 36760 4.5 2865
18 3 84Kr 29.1 5.347 × 105 1.000 × 107 23940 4.5 2106
19 3 84Kr 29.1 5.247 × 105 9.97 × 106 23980 18 2120
20 3 84Kr 34.5 5.256 × 105 9.953 × 106 23740 18 2605
21 3 84Kr 34.5 5.293 × 105 9.965 × 106 23770 4.5 1957
22 2 84Kr 29.1 5.349 × 105 1.002 × 107 23890 4.5 1863
23 2 84Kr 29.1 5.439 × 105 1.004 × 107 23960 18 2372
24 2 84Kr 34.5 5.562 × 105 1.005 × 107 23980 18 2255
25 2 84Kr 34.5 5.632 × 105 1.000 × 107 23860 4.5 1905
26 5 84Kr 29.1 5.464 × 105 9.978 × 106 23800 4.5 2229
27 5 84Kr 29.1 5.325 × 105 9.986 × 106 23820 18 2678
28 5 84Kr 34.5 5.345 × 105 9.995 × 106 23850 18 2537
29 5 84Kr 34.5 5.288 × 105 1.005 × 107 23970 4.5 2217
30 5 63Cu 19.3 5.240 × 105 1.004 × 107 15880 4.5 1413
31 5 63Cu 19.3 4.848 × 105 1.002 × 107 15830 18 1977
32 2 63Cu 19.3 4.451 × 105 9.999 × 106 15800 18 1717
33 2 63Cu 19.3 3.986 × 105 9.987 × 106 15790 4.5 1437
34 3 63Cu 19.3 3.458 × 105 1.001 × 107 15830 4.5 1594
35 3 63Cu 19.3 3.286 × 105 1.003 × 107 15850 18 1919

Additional follow-up testing was performed using fresh devices (DUTs 6, 7, and 8). For these tests, lower-energy ions were used, to determine the transient onset point. Readpoints of 1.31MeV-cm2 / mg, 2.68MeV-cm2 / mg, 8.21MeV-cm2 / mg, and 18.9MeV-cm2 / mg were explored. The test conditions previously described were replicated for these runs.

Table 5-4 TAMU SET Follow-up Characterization Run Summary
Run Number DUT Ion LETeff (MeV-cm2 /mg) Flux ( ions/s-cm2) Fluence (ions/cm2) Total Ionizing Dose (rad) VS (V+ − V-) Events (Sum of All Channels)
60 6 20Ne 2.68 1.141 × 105 9.984 × 106 428 18 38
61 6 20Ne 2.68 1.196 × 105 1.000 × 107 429 4.5 44
62 7 20Ne 2.68 1.250 × 105 9.991 × 106 429 4.5 44
63 7 20Ne 2.68 1.272 × 105 1.001 × 107 429 18 53
64 8 20Ne 2.68 1.249 × 105 1.003 × 107 430 18 32
65 8 20Ne 2.68 1.241 × 105 9.977 × 106 428 4.5 40
66 8 14N 1.31 1.272 × 105 1.004 × 107 211 4.5 28
67 8 14N 1.31 1.262 × 105 9.985 × 106 210 18 34
69 7 14N 1.31 1.192 × 105 9.961 × 106 209 18 24
70 7 14N 1.31 1.198 × 105 1.003 × 107 211 4.5 31
71 6 14N 1.31 1.222 × 105 1.005 × 107 211 4.5 24
72 6 14N 1.31 1.233 × 105 1.005 × 107 211 18 29
73 6 40Ar 8.21 8.666 × 104 1.003 × 107 1320 18 119
74 6 40Ar 8.21 8.832 × 104 1.002 × 107 1318 4.5 96
75 7 40Ar 8.21 9.568 × 104 1.001 × 107 1316 4.5 86
76 7 40Ar 8.21 9.561 × 104 1.001 × 107 1316 18 96
77 8 40Ar 8.21 1.014 × 105 9.926 × 106 1310 18 116
78 8 40Ar 8.21 1.001 × 105 9.979 × 106 1312 4.5 103
79 8 63Cu 18.9 3.081 × 104 1.001 × 107 3036 4.5 401
80 8 63Cu 18.9 2.097 × 104 9.993 × 106 3030 18 439
81 7 63Cu 18.9 2.000 × 104 9.998 × 106 3032 18 477
82 7 63Cu 18.9 2.132 × 104 9.997 × 106 3032 4.5 384
83 6 63Cu 18.9 2.490 × 104 1.001 × 107 3035 4.5 368
84 6 63Cu 18.9 2.540 × 104 1.001 × 107 3036 18 417