SBOA626 December   2025 OPA187 , OPA192 , OPA202 , OPA320

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Simple Analogy Explaining Instability
    2. 1.2 Circuits With Possible Stability Issues
    3. 1.3 Simple Stability Correction Based on Datasheet Plots
    4. 1.4 Introducing Lab Tools and Measurements
  5. 2Stability Theory for Operational Amplifiers
    1. 2.1 Poles and Zeros
    2. 2.2 Operational Amplifier Model Requirements for Stability Verification
    3. 2.3 Stability Definitions Based on Control Loop Model
    4. 2.4 Graphing Loop-Gain Based on AOL and 1/β
    5. 2.5 Rate of Closure Stability Test
    6. 2.6 Indirect (Non-Invasive) Stability Tests
  6. 3Simulating Open-Loop Stability Tests
    1. 3.1 Breaking the Loop the Wrong Way
    2. 3.2 Breaking the Loop With LC Test Circuit
    3. 3.3 Differential Loop Break Test
  7. 4Stability Correction for Capacitive Load
    1. 4.1 Isolation Resistor (RISO) Method
    2. 4.2 Dual Feedback Method
      1. 4.2.1 RISO-Dual-Feedback With RL
      2. 4.2.2 Dual Feedback With RFX Method
    3. 4.3 Snubber Circuit for Compensating Power Amplifiers and Reference Drive
    4. 4.4 Noise Gain for Stability Compensation
    5. 4.5 Feedback Capacitor (CF) Compensation for Capacitive Load
  8. 5Stability Corrections for Capacitance on the Inverting Node
    1. 5.1 Input Capacitance Instability Due to Zero in 1/β
    2. 5.2 Feedback Capacitor Solves Stability Issue for Capacitance on the Inverting Node
    3. 5.3 Minimum, Balanced, and Maximum Feedback Capacitance
    4. 5.4 Transimpedance Case
  9. 6Complex Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Output Impedance
    1. 6.1 Converting Open-Loop Output Impedance to Closed-Loop Output Impedance
    2. 6.2 Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Model Test
    3. 6.3 Instability Due to Resonance From Complex Output Impedance
    4. 6.4 Impact of Internal Op Amp Topology on Output Impedance Versus Frequency
    5. 6.5 Other Factors Effecting Output Impedance
  10. 7AOL Impact on Stability
    1. 7.1 AOL Secondary Poles and Zeros
    2. 7.2 Modeling the AOL Secondary Poles and Zeros and Input Capacitance
    3. 7.3 Decompensated Op Amps and Stability
    4. 7.4 The Impact of Closed-Loop Gain on Stability
  11. 8Common Problems in Stability Analysis
  12. 9References

Operational Amplifier Model Requirements for Stability Verification

Figure 1-1 illustrates the minimum requirement for an op amp model that can be used for stability testing. The model must accurately match the real AOL over frequency, the open-loop output impedance, and input capacitance of the op-amp. The DC AOL value is modeled with the voltage-controlled voltage source on the input (VCVS1 = –1M V/V, for 120dB). The dominant pole is modeled with simple RC low pass filters. The output of the low pass filter is buffered with a voltage-controlled voltage source in a gain of 1V/V. The open-loop output impedance (ZO) is modeled with a simple resistor in this case, but many devices require a complex impedance.

Figure 1-3 illustrates the graph of AOL for Figure 2-3. Notice that the DC AOL corresponds to VCVS1, and the dominant pole corresponds to 1/(2 × π × R1 × C1). Note that the dominant pole imparts a –90° phase shift. The phase shift at low frequency is 180° due to the op amps negative feedback. Beyond the dominant pole, many op amps have multiple secondary poles and zeros near the unity gain frequency of the amplifier, as well as input capacitance (see Modeling the AOL Secondary Poles and Zeros and Input Capacitance for details).

Figure 2-4 illustrates the open-loop output impedance for the model shown in Figure 2-3. This model uses a resistive open-loop output impedance (ZO). Resistive ZO (denoted as RO) is the easiest to understand and also the better case from a stability perspective. The initial theory, assuming ZO is resistive, is explained in this document, and later shows how a complex ZO can impact stability. Practical op amps can have a resistive ZO or complex ZO. Modeling the output impedance of an op amp for stability analysis explains how to build a model with a complex ZO. Most Texas Instruments' models accurately model both ZO and AOL over frequency so individually developing these models is generally unnecessary.

OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Operational Amplifier Model
                    for Stability Simulations Figure 2-3 Operational Amplifier Model for Stability Simulations
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Open-Loop Gain Versus
                    Frequency for Stability Model Figure 2-4 Open-Loop Gain Versus Frequency for Stability Model
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Resistive Open-Loop Output
                    Impedance Versus Frequency for Stability Model Figure 2-5 Resistive Open-Loop Output Impedance Versus Frequency for Stability Model
OPA187 OPA202 OPA320 OPA192 Complex, Open-Loop, Output
                    Impedance Example (OPA189) Figure 2-6 Complex, Open-Loop, Output Impedance Example (OPA189)