SSZTC68 september   2015 CSD86350Q5D , LM25145 , LM27402 , LM27403 , LM5145 , LM5175 , LM5175-Q1


  1.   1
  2.   2
    1.     3
    2.     Value Proposition of High-density PCB Designs
    3.     Additional Resources:

Timothy Hegarty

As I mentioned in part 1, the printed circuit board (PCB) area dedicated to power management is an immense constraint for system designers. Reducing converter losses is an essential requirement to enable a compact realization in space-constrained applications with limited PCB real estate.

The ability to flexibly deploy a converter at a strategic location on the board is also important – take for instance a high-current point-of-load (POL) module, optimally located adjacent to a load for smaller conduction drop and better load transient performance.

Consider the power stage layout in Figure 1 of a miniaturized form-factor buck converter. As an embedded POL module implementation, it uses an all-ceramic capacitor design, an efficient shielded inductor, vertically stacked MOSFETs, a voltage-mode controller and a six-layer PCB with 2oz copper.

GUID-43C292C9-1275-47D5-A7DC-AB6A1BE90F69-low.png Figure 1 25A Synchronous Buck Converter PCB Layout and Implementation.

The main tenets of this design are high power density and low bill-of-materials (BOM) cost. It occupies a total PCB area of 2.2cm2 (0.34in2), yielding an effective current density per unit area of 11.3A/cm2 (75A/in2). Power density per unit volume at 3.3V output is 57W/cm3 (930W/in3).

The normal approach to attaining high power density is to increase switching frequency. By contrast, you can achieve miniaturization through strategic component selection while retaining a relatively low switching frequency of 300kHz to lessen frequency proportional losses such as MOSFET switching loss and inductor core loss. Table 1 lists the essential components for this design.

Table 1 POL Module Components, Package Sizes and Recommended Pad Dimensions.
Power train components Footprint and profile (mm) Recommended land pattern outer dimensions (mm)
CSD86350Q5D NexFETÔ Power Block 5.0 x 6.0 x 1.5 (SON5x6) 5.15 x 6.24
LM27402 3V-20V PWM controller 4.0 x 4.0 x 0.8 (WQFN-16) 4.2 x 4.2
0.68µH 1.6mΩ 33A filter inductor 11.5 x 10.3 x 4.0 4.1 x 13.6
22µF input and 47µF output X5R capacitors 2.0 x 1.25 x 1.35 (0805) 2.2 x 1.3
Terminal connections 2.0 x 3.0 2.0 x 3.0 (on host board)

Value Proposition of High-density PCB Designs

Clearly, the PCB is an important (and sometimes most expensive) component in a design. The value proposition of a well-planned and carefully executed PCB layout for a high-density DC/DC converter lies in:

  • More functionality in space-constrained designs (reduced solution volume and footprint).
  • Reduced switching-loop parasitic inductance, contributing to:
    • Lower power MOSFET voltage stress (switch-node voltage spike) and ringing.
    • Reduced switching loss.
    • Lower electromagnetic interference (EMI), magnetic field coupling and output noise signature.
    • Extra margin to survive input rail-transient-voltage disturbances, especially in wide-VIN-range applications.
  • Increased reliability and robustness (lower component temperatures).
  • Cost savings related to a smaller PCB, fewer filtering components and the elimination of snubbers.
  • Differentiated designs provide a competitive advantage, capture customer attention, and increase revenue.

It’s fair to say that PCB layout defines the performance ultimately achieved from a switching power converter. Of course, the designer is quite happy to avoid countless hours of debugging time for EMI, noise, signal integrity, and other issues related to a poor layout.

Additional Resources: