All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
With the never-ending trend of faster data rates, smaller form factors, and increased power density, board space is becoming gradually scarcer. This makes the job of the power-supply designer increasingly difficult as trying to fulfill all the design requirements, while keeping solution size to a minimum, is no small feat.
One way to go about minimizing the footprint that the power supply leaves on the total design is to choose a converter with a high switching frequency. With higher switching frequencies, design requirements such as output current ripple, output voltage ripple, and load transient can be achieved by using less inductance and output capacitance. This reduces solution size and decreases the total BOM cost of the power supply.
One of the disadvantages of going for higher switching frequencies is increased switching losses. The increased switching losses do not always correlate to decreased efficiency throughout the output current range. It should not be overlooked that switching losses are only one part of the total losses that occur during the operation of a buck converter. As a matter of fact, at higher currents, the conduction losses become the dominant contributor of power loss.
TI’s TPS628512 is a high frequency synchronous buck converter with a small 1.6-mm x 2.1-mm package which provides a small solution size optimized for space constrained applications. Later on in this application note, the TPS628512 will be compared with the TPS54218 to show the impact of conduction losses, in particular, conduction losses in the inductor, on the final efficiency.
There are three main sources of power loss in synchronous buck converters: quiescent losses (static losses), switching losses and conduction losses. In today’s buck converters the quiescent losses generally represent only a small percentage of the total losses when the load at the output of the converter is above a few tens of milliamps. This application note looks at relatively higher currents, in which case, the switching and conduction losses play a much bigger factor than the quiescent losses – which can be neglected.
The following two sections will briefly go through the causes of switching losses and conduction losses in synchronous buck converters.
Switching losses in synchronous buck converters are the result of charging and discharging the gate to drain and gate to source capacitances of the power MOSFETs when they are turned on and off. These losses can be calculated with the following equations:
Where:
One part of the conduction losses (Joule losses) in a buck converter are due to the drain-source on-state resistance of the power MOSFETs:
and the other part is due to the DCR of the inductor:
Where:
What is important to notice from these equations is that the conduction losses are dependent on the square of the RMS value of the current flowing through the particular MOSFET and through the inductor. And unlike the switching losses they are independent of switching frequency, as long as the inductor current ripple is held constant.
Figure 2-2 shows a calculated example efficiency curve of a synchronous buck converter plotted on the left y-axis along with the corresponding switching and conduction losses plotted on the right y-axis with respect to output current. This figure clearly displays how, due to the dependency on the square of the output current, at a certain point the conduction losses become the dominating factor and at higher currents their effect on efficiency is much more significant than that of the switching losses. In general, the switching losses and conduction losses are equal near the peak of the efficiency curve.
This section will compare the design and performance of two 2-A buck converters; the TPS54218 and the TPS628512 which have been set to operate with a switching frequency of 200-kHz and 1.8-MHz respectively.
The inductors used for this example come from the same series of inductors from Coilcraft (the XGL4030) with a size of 4-mm x 4-mm x 3-mm and their inductances were selected so that the inductor current ripple is similar for both designs – this is important for a fair efficiency comparison since the RMS value of the inductor current affects the conduction losses. The inductor current ripple and the ripple ratio in a buck converter can be calculated with the following equations respectively:
A 1-uH inductor was chosen for the TPS628512 which is operating with a switching frequency of 1.8-MHz and an 8.2-uH inductor was selected for the TPS54218 operating at 200-kHz. The resulting inductor current ripple ratio at 2-A is 0.32 for the TPS628512 and 0.35 for the TPS54218, the current ripple ratios are sufficiently close for this test.
The fact that both the 1uH and the 8.2-uH inductors are the same size, means that the 8.2-uH inductor will naturally have a greater DCR. The reason for that is, in order to achieve a higher inductance, the winding of the inductor has to contain a higher number of turns – thereby increasing the length of the copper wire which increases its resistance.
For this particular design the 1 uH inductor has a typical DCR of 6.5-mOhms and the 8.2-uH inductor has a typical DCR of 55-mOhms. It can be concluded that the DCR of the inductor has increased by the same factor as the inductance, almost 8-fold.
Figure 3-1 compares the measured efficiencies of both designs at VIN = 5-V and VOUT = 1.8-V, showing that the TPS628512 has less losses when the output current exceeds 1-A. The TPS628512 also has a Power Save Mode, allowing the converter to operate with pulse-frequency modulation at lower currents which decreases the switching losses and increases efficiency.
This efficiency improvement goes on top of the other benefits of high switching frequency converters such as having a smaller solutions size because of requiring less output capacitance to meet the same output ripple and transient performance as the low switching frequency converters. In this case, due to the lower BOM count and the lower output capacitance, the total solution size of the TPS628512 comes in at 48mm2, whereas the TPS54218 running at a lower switching frequency takes up 92 mm2 of board space – almost twice as much.
As with every power supply design, there are trade-offs to be made, but losing efficiency when using high-switching frequency converters doesn’t necessarily have to be one of them. This application note shows that at higher loads operating at high-switching frequencies can have an efficiency benefit at higher currents, due to the fact that they allow for the use of inductors with a lower inductance and as a result lower DCR.
| TI PROVIDES TECHNICAL AND RELIABILITY DATA (INCLUDING DATASHEETS), DESIGN RESOURCES (INCLUDING REFERENCE DESIGNS), APPLICATION OR OTHER DESIGN ADVICE, WEB TOOLS, SAFETY INFORMATION, AND OTHER RESOURCES “AS IS” AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. |
| These resources are intended for skilled developers designing with TI products. You are solely responsible for (1) selecting the appropriate TI products for your application, (2) designing, validating and testing your application, and (3) ensuring your application meets applicable standards, and any other safety, security, or other requirements. These resources are subject to change without notice. TI grants you permission to use these resources only for development of an application that uses the TI products described in the resource. Other reproduction and display of these resources is prohibited. No license is granted to any other TI intellectual property right or to any third party intellectual property right. TI disclaims responsibility for, and you will fully indemnify TI and its representatives against, any claims, damages, costs, losses, and liabilities arising out of your use of these resources. |
| TI’s products are provided subject to TI’s Terms of Sale (www.ti.com/legal/termsofsale.html) or other applicable terms available either on ti.com or provided in conjunction with such TI products. TI’s provision of these resources does not expand or otherwise alter TI’s applicable warranties or warranty disclaimers for TI products. |
| Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright © 2020, Texas Instruments Incorporated |